Daily Current Affairs : 30-December-2023

Argentina’s decision to formally reject the invitation to join the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) group of major emerging economies marks a significant shift in the country’s foreign policy. This move comes as the membership of Argentina, along with Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates, was set to take effect from January 1, 2024.

President Milei’s Geopolitical Alignment:

The rejection of BRICS membership is closely tied to the stance of Argentina’s new president, Milei. During his election campaign, Milei openly expressed a geopolitical alignment with the United States and Israel. This alignment underscores his reluctance to form alliances with communist nations, such as those within the BRICS group.

Campaign Promises Translated into Policy:

President Milei’s decision aligns seamlessly with the promises he made to the Argentine electorate during his campaign. By rejecting BRICS membership, he is translating his campaign rhetoric into concrete foreign policy actions. This demonstrates a clear departure from the foreign policy approach of the previous administration, signaling a new era in Argentina’s global engagements.

Implications for Argentina’s Diplomacy:
  • The rejection of BRICS membership implies a recalibration of Argentina’s diplomatic priorities.
  • President Milei’s alignment with the United States and Israel may lead to strengthened ties with these nations.
  • Argentina’s stance could impact its relationships with BRICS member countries, potentially influencing trade and cooperation dynamics.
Important Points:
  • Argentina’s formal rejection of BRICS membership signifies a significant shift in the country’s foreign policy.
  • The decision was in line with the geopolitical alignment expressed by President Milei during his election campaign, emphasizing a preference for closer ties with the United States and Israel.
  • President Milei’s reluctance to ally with communist nations, a stance communicated during the campaign, influenced the rejection of BRICS membership.
  • The rejection of BRICS membership is a tangible manifestation of President Milei’s campaign promises, indicating a commitment to translating rhetoric into concrete foreign policy actions.
  • This move marks a departure from the foreign policy approach of the previous administration, signaling a new era in Argentina’s global engagements.
  • The rejection has implications for Argentina’s diplomatic priorities, suggesting a recalibration in its international relationships.
  • President Milei’s alignment with the United States and Israel may lead to strengthened ties with these nations, impacting Argentina’s global alliances.
  • The decision could potentially influence trade and cooperation dynamics with BRICS member countries.
  • Overall, Argentina’s rejection of BRICS membership reflects a deliberate choice to realign its geopolitical priorities, shaping the country’s diplomatic relationships on the global stage.
Why In News

Argentina has formally rejected the invitation to join the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) group of major emerging economies, citing its commitment to pursuing independent economic policies that align with its national interests and strategic priorities.

MCQs about Argentina’s Foreign Policy Turn from BRICS

  1. Why did Argentina reject BRICS membership under President Milei?
    A. Economic concerns
    B. Geopolitical alignment with the United States and Israel
    C. Influence from BRICS member countries
    D. Change in leadership style
    Correct Answer: B. Geopolitical alignment with the United States and Israel
    Explanation: The rejection was closely tied to President Milei’s expressed geopolitical alignment with the United States and Israel, as highlighted during his election campaign.
  2. What is the significance of President Milei’s rejection of BRICS membership?
    A. Continuation of the previous administration’s foreign policy
    B. A shift in Argentina’s diplomatic priorities
    C. Economic benefits for Argentina
    D. Isolation from global alliances
    Correct Answer: B. A shift in Argentina’s diplomatic priorities
    Explanation: The rejection marks a significant shift in Argentina’s foreign policy under President Milei, signaling a departure from the approach of the previous administration.
  3. How does President Milei’s decision align with his campaign promises?
    A. It contradicts his campaign rhetoric
    B. It is unrelated to his campaign promises
    C. It translates campaign rhetoric into concrete foreign policy actions
    D. It focuses solely on economic considerations
    Correct Answer: C. It translates campaign rhetoric into concrete foreign policy actions
    Explanation: President Milei’s rejection of BRICS membership is a tangible manifestation of his campaign promises, demonstrating a commitment to turning rhetoric into action.
  4. What potential impact could Argentina’s rejection of BRICS membership have on its international relationships?
    A. Strengthening ties with BRICS member countries
    B. No impact on diplomatic relationships
    C. Recalibration in Argentina’s international relationships
    D. Isolation from global affairs
    Correct Answer: C. Recalibration in Argentina’s international relationships
    Explanation: The rejection suggests a recalibration in Argentina’s diplomatic priorities, potentially impacting its international relationships and alliances.

Boost up your confidence by appearing our Weekly Current Affairs Multiple Choice Questions

Loading