The National Socialist Council of Nagaland, also known as NSCN (I-M), has recently made a claim regarding the inclusion of six minor tribes in the State of Nagaland. This claim has sparked discussions and debates about the ethnic composition and identity of the region. In this essay, we will delve into the details of NSCN (I-M)’s assertion, examine the context of the situation, and explore the implications of this claim on the Meitei and Kuki communities.

The Claim of NSCN (I-M)

According to NSCN (I-M), the six minor tribes Aimol, Chiru, Chothe, Kharam, Koireng, and Kom should be considered part of the Naga community. By making this claim, NSCN (I-M) aims to emphasize that the Meitei and Kuki people should not harass or discriminate against these minor tribes based on their perceived tribal affiliations.

Understanding the Context

To fully comprehend the significance of NSCN (I-M)’s claim, it is essential to understand the ethnic landscape of Manipur, the state in which this situation has unfolded. Manipur is home to 33 tribes, with the Meiteis, Nagas, and Kukis constituting the majority of the population. The Meiteis, who also include the Pangals (Muslims), form the largest ethnic group in Manipur.

Ambiguities in Tribal Identity

One of the complexities in understanding Manipur’s tribal identities lies in the fact that many tribes are classified either as Nagas or Kukis, often overlooking their unique cultural and historical backgrounds. Over time, tribal groups representing the Kukis and Nagas have periodically claimed the inclusion of minor tribes into their respective folds, further blurring the lines of tribal affiliation.

The Kuki Request for Constitutional Recognition

To illustrate this phenomenon, we can refer to the Kukis’ request to Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1987. During that time, the Kukis sought constitutional recognition for 30 tribes as Kukis, aiming to solidify their ethnic identity and establish a sense of unity among their various subgroups.

Implications and Challenges

NSCN (I-M)’s claim regarding the inclusion of the six minor tribes in the Naga community raises important questions and challenges. Let’s explore some of the key implications:

  1. Ethnic Identity and Recognition: This claim highlights the ongoing struggle for ethnic recognition and the complexities of tribal identity in Manipur. It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive and inclusive understanding of the state’s diverse ethnic groups.
  2. Intercommunity Relations: The assertion by NSCN (I-M) serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required in maintaining positive intercommunity relations. It urges the Meitei and Kuki communities to respect the cultural identities of the minor tribes and avoid any form of harassment or discrimination.

Important Points:

  • NSCN (I-M) claims six minor tribes (Aimol, Chiru, Chothe, Kharam, Koireng, and Kom) as part of the Naga community. 🏞️
  • Meitei and Kuki communities should not harass or discriminate against these minor tribes. ✋🚫
  • Manipur has 33 tribes, with Meiteis, Nagas, and Kukis comprising the majority. 🗺️👥
  • Many tribes are classified as either Nagas or Kukis, overlooking their unique cultural backgrounds. 🔄🚧
  • Kukis requested constitutional recognition for 30 tribes as Kukis in 1987. 📜🤝
  • The claim highlights the struggle for ethnic recognition and complexities of tribal identity. 🔍🧩
  • It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of Manipur’s diverse ethnic groups. 🌍👥
  • Positive intercommunity relations are crucial, requiring respect for cultural identities. 🤝💞
Why In News

The National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-I-M) asserts that six indigenous tribes within the State are rightfully recognized as Nagas, a testament to their shared history, culture, and heritage. This acknowledgment by the NSCN (I-M) contributes to fostering a unified identity among these diverse tribes while promoting mutual respect and understanding within the Naga community.

MCQs about NSCN (I-M)’s Claim in Manipur

  1. What is the claim made by NSCN (I-M) regarding six minor tribes in Manipur?
    A. They are part of the Meitei community.
    B. They should form a separate ethnic group.
    C. They are part of the Kuki community.
    D. They are part of the Naga community.
    Correct Answer: D. They are part of the Naga community.
    Explanation: NSCN (I-M) claims that the six minor tribes (Aimol, Chiru, Chothe, Kharam, Koireng, and Kom) are part of the Naga community.
  2. Which of the following communities account for much of Manipur’s population?
    A. Pangals and Nagas
    B. Meiteis and Kukis
    C. Nagas and Kukis
    D. Meiteis and Pangals
    Correct Answer: B. Meiteis and Kukis
    Explanation: The Meiteis and Kukis account for a significant portion of Manipur’s population.
  3. What is one of the challenges in understanding tribal identity in Manipur?
    A. Lack of historical records
    B. Language barriers
    C. Blurring of lines between Nagas and Meiteis
    D. Frequent migration of tribal communities
    Correct Answer: C. Blurring of lines between Nagas and Meiteis
    Explanation: Many tribes in Manipur are classified as either Nagas or Kukis, often overlooking their unique cultural and historical backgrounds.
  4. What is the key implication of NSCN (I-M)’s claim regarding the minor tribes?
    A. Struggle for constitutional recognition
    B. Need for intercommunity harmony
    C. Ethnic tensions between Nagas and Kukis
    D. Quest for cultural preservation
    Correct Answer: B. Need for intercommunity harmony
    Explanation: NSCN (I-M)’s claim emphasizes the importance of positive intercommunity relations and avoiding harassment or discrimination towards the minor tribes.

Boost up your confidence by appearing our Weekly Current Affairs Multiple Choice Questions

Loading