Hindu Editorial Analysis : 3-April-2024

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has recently clarified an important legal point regarding the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. It ruled that courts can release accused individuals under police custody without meeting certain conditions that were previously mandatory under the Act. This decision has significant implications for how money laundering cases are handled in India.

Understanding the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The PMLA serves as the backbone of India’s efforts to fight money laundering. It was enacted by the Indian Parliament on July 1, 2005, under Article 253, allowing India to implement international conventions related to financial crimes. The Act aims to achieve three main goals:

  • Prevent and Control Money Laundering: This involves taking measures to stop money laundering activities before they occur.
  • Confiscate Laundered Property: The law enables authorities to seize assets obtained through money laundering.
  • Address Related Issues: The PMLA tackles any problems connected to money laundering in India.

The Director of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) have been given specific powers to enforce this law.

Key Issues with PMLA

While the PMLA aims to combat money laundering effectively, there are some emerging issues:

Crime Proceeds
  • The PMLA focuses on the proceeds of crime, which can lead to individuals being guilty even if they had no direct involvement in the original crime.
  • Under this law, the accused is presumed guilty until proven innocent, which contradicts the fundamental legal principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”
Scope of Offenses
  • The Act includes many offenses that may not be directly related to money laundering.
  • Its coverage extends beyond serious crimes like drug trafficking, raising concerns about its broad application.
Lack of Transparency
  • The Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) lacks clear procedures for starting investigations.
  • Accused individuals often remain unaware of the contents of the ECIR, leading to questions about fairness.
Bail Provisions
  • The bail provisions in the PMLA have significant political implications.
  • A Supreme Court ruling in 2018 deemed certain bail conditions unconstitutional, stating they violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. However, in 2022, the court upheld various PMLA provisions that allow for arrests and seizures.

Why In News

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that courts can order the release of an accused in a money laundering case from police custody without fulfilling the twin conditions previously mandated under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, signaling a significant shift in how such cases may be handled in the future.

MCQs about Recent Developments in Money Laundering Law

  1. What recent decision did the Punjab and Haryana High Court make regarding the release of accused individuals under the PMLA?
    A. Courts cannot release accused individuals at all.
    B. Courts can order release without fulfilling certain twin conditions.
    C. Only the Supreme Court can release accused individuals.
    D. Release is granted automatically after six months.
    Correct Answer: B. Courts can order release without fulfilling certain twin conditions.
    Explanation: The court clarified that it can order the release of accused individuals in money laundering cases without adhering to the twin conditions that were previously required under the PMLA.
  2. What are the three main objectives of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)?
    A. Preventing money laundering, improving financial literacy, and regulating banks.
    B. Preventing money laundering, confiscating laundered property, and addressing related issues.
    C. Enhancing law enforcement, regulating financial markets, and promoting economic growth.
    D. Creating new banking laws, expanding the tax base, and international cooperation.
    Correct Answer: B. Preventing money laundering, confiscating laundered property, and addressing related issues.
    Explanation: The PMLA aims to prevent and control money laundering, confiscate assets derived from such activities, and deal with any issues related to money laundering in India.
  3. What significant issue arises from the presumption of guilt under the PMLA?
    A. It makes prosecutions faster.
    B. It contradicts the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”
    C. It encourages more financial literacy programs.
    D. It allows for easier bail processes.
    Correct Answer: B. It contradicts the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”
    Explanation: The PMLA presumes the accused guilty until proven innocent, which goes against the fundamental legal principle that a person is innocent until proven guilty.
  4. What did the Supreme Court rule regarding the bail provisions of the PMLA in 2018?
    A. They were deemed beneficial for the accused.
    B. They were upheld as constitutional.
    C. They were ruled unconstitutional for violating Articles 14 and 21.
    D. They were completely removed from the law.
    Correct Answer: C. They were ruled unconstitutional for violating Articles 14 and 21.
    Explanation: In 2018, the Supreme Court found that the bail provisions in the PMLA violated the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 14 (equality before the law) and 21 (right to life and personal liberty).

Boost up your confidence by appearing our Weekly Current Affairs Multiple Choice Questions

Loading