Hindu Editorial Analysis : 21-January-2025

The discussion surrounding the legalisation of Minimum Support Price (MSP) has become more intense in recent years. While the intention behind MSP is to secure farmers’ incomes, its implementation could pose significant economic, logistical, and systemic challenges. A balanced evaluation of both the advantages and disadvantages of MSP is essential for making informed decisions.

What is MSP?
  • Definition: MSP is a government policy aimed at protecting farmers from sudden price drops by setting a minimum price for their produce.
  • Implementation: It is announced at the start of the sowing season, based on recommendations by the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP).
  • Objectives: The key goals are ensuring income security for farmers, promoting food security, incentivizing production, and maintaining market stability.
Historical Background

MSP was first introduced in the 1960s to address food shortages and boost agricultural production for food security. The K. Jha Committee recommended MSP to protect farmers from market fluctuations. Initially, it was applied to wheat and rice, but today it covers 23 crops, including cereals, pulses, oilseeds, and commercial crops. Special provisions for sugarcane were introduced in 2009 under the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) system.

Arguments Against Legalising MSP
  • Fiscal Burden: A nationwide MSP-based procurement system could cost the government over ₹17 lakh crore annually, straining the national budget.
  • Market Distortions:
    • Farmers may focus on crops with higher MSP, leading to surpluses of certain crops like paddy, while other essential crops, like pulses, may be neglected.
    • Encouraging water-intensive crops in water-scarce regions could worsen environmental stress.
  • Storage and Infrastructure Issues: India’s storage and transportation systems are inadequate, causing wastage of produce, especially perishables.
  • Inefficiency: MSP could discourage farmers from modernizing their practices or diversifying crops, reducing agricultural competitiveness in global markets.
  • Inflationary Pressure: High procurement costs could push food prices up, burdening lower-income households.
  • Administrative Challenges: Managing procurement for millions of farmers could result in delays, inefficiencies, and even corruption.
Arguments Supporting Legalising MSP
  • Financial Security: MSP ensures farmers receive a stable income, offering protection against market volatility.
  • Risk Coverage: It acts as a safety net against unpredictable risks such as climate change, pest attacks, or crop diseases.
  • Encouraging Sustainable Practices: Expanding MSP to include less water-intensive crops like pulses could help promote more sustainable farming practices.
  • Market Stability: MSP provides a reference price, ensuring that farmers are fairly compensated and preventing exploitation.
Alternative Solutions
  • Promoting Crop Diversification: Encouraging farmers to grow a wider variety of crops can reduce dependence on just a few and promote sustainability.
  • Expanding Crop Insurance: Strengthening schemes like Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) could help cover price risks and provide support in the event of climate-related disasters.
  • Investing in Infrastructure: Developing better storage facilities, transport networks, and processing units could reduce wastage and improve market access for farmers.
  • Encouraging Contract Farming: Public-private partnerships could help create more reliable market linkages and offer farmers guaranteed returns.
  • Modernising Agricultural Practices: Providing training and subsidies can help farmers adopt advanced, efficient farming techniques to improve productivity.
Why In News

The debate on the legalisation of Minimum Support Price (MSP) has intensified in recent years, as stakeholders weigh the potential benefits against the challenges of implementation. While the intention behind this move is to safeguard farmers’ incomes, its implementation carries significant economic, logistical, and systemic risks that could have far-reaching consequences for the agricultural sector and the economy as a whole.

MCQs about The Debate on Legalising Minimum Support Price (MSP)
  1. What is the primary objective of the Minimum Support Price (MSP)?
    A. To promote the export of agricultural produce
    B. To ensure fair compensation for farmers and protect their incomes
    C. To reduce government spending on agriculture
    D. To encourage farmers to adopt modern farming techniques
    Correct Answer: B. To ensure fair compensation for farmers and protect their incomes
    Explanation: MSP is designed to provide a minimum price for crops to ensure farmers receive fair compensation, safeguarding their income and protecting them from market volatility.
  2. Which of the following is a significant concern about the widespread implementation of MSP?
    A. It encourages crop diversification
    B. It could lead to fiscal sustainability
    C. It could result in increased government spending, straining the economy
    D. It leads to the reduction of food prices
    Correct Answer: C. It could result in increased government spending, straining the economy
    Explanation: A nationwide MSP system could lead to excessive government spending, which may be unsustainable, costing the government large amounts annually.
  3. How does the MSP system potentially distort agricultural markets?
    A. By increasing the production of essential crops
    B. By encouraging the overproduction of water-intensive crops like paddy
    C. By reducing the need for crop insurance
    D. By lowering the price of essential food items
    Correct Answer: B. By encouraging the overproduction of water-intensive crops like paddy
    Explanation: Farmers may focus on high-MSP crops, especially water-intensive ones like paddy, which could lead to surpluses and neglect of other important crops, creating imbalances in agricultural production.
  4. What is one proposed alternative to the legalisation of MSP?
    A. Promoting a one-size-fits-all approach to crop pricing
    B. Expanding crop insurance schemes to cover price risks and climate shocks
    C. Encouraging all farmers to focus on water-intensive crops
    D. Reducing government support for agriculture altogether
    Correct Answer: B. Expanding crop insurance schemes to cover price risks and climate shocks
    Explanation: Strengthening crop insurance, such as the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), would provide additional financial security for farmers in case of price fluctuations or climate-related issues, as an alternative to MSP.

Boost up your confidence by appearing our Weekly Current Affairs Multiple Choice Questions

Loading